STATUTE SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED THAT IT DEFEATS ITS PURPOSE

The settled position of the law is that provisions of a statute must not be constructed in a way as would defeat the intendment of the statute and the desire of the legislature. The court should not interpret the provisions of the statute to defeat the obvious end it was meant to serve otherwise it...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

STATUTES ARE TO BE GIVEN THE ORDINARY MEANING

It is a settled cardinal principle of statutory interpretation that where, in their ordinary meaning the provisions are clear and unambiguous effect should be given to them without resorting to external aid. The duty of the court is to interpret the words of the statute as used. Those words may be ambiguous, but even if...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

COURT SHOULD AVOID INTERPRETATION THAT WOULD REDUCE THE LEGISLATURE TO FUTILITY

Where there are two choices of interpretation. The court should always avoid the interpretation that would reduce the legislation to futility and adopt the one that would bring about the effective result. – Nnaemeka-agu, JSC. Ude v. Nwara (1993) Was this dictum helpful? Yes 0 No 0...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 82 CFRN 1999

It appears rather from the resolution, exhibit A, and the proceedings of the house, exhibit C, that the purposes is the decision of the house to show resentment for the respondent’s affront in daring to publish something about highly placed legislators rather than a plan for the investigation of the members for abuse. This should...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS NEEDED ORIGINATING SUMMONS IS APPROPRIATE

KEYAMO VS. HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, LAGOS STATE (2000) 11 W.R.N. 29 at 40, (2000) 12 NWLR (Pt. 680) 796 at 213 stated as follows: “I must state that the correct position of the law is that originating summons is used to commence an action where the issue involved is one of the construction of a written law or of any instrument made under a written law, or of any deed, contract or other document or some other question of law or where there is unlikely to be any substantial dispute of fact. This is the provision of Order 3 Rule 2 (2) of the Lagos State Civil Procedure (supra)”

Was this dictum helpful?

BY INTERPRETATION ACT, SINGULAR MEANS PLURAL IN ANY LEGISLATION

Let me hasten to state that even if the phrase any person denotes singular, by Section 14 of the Interpretation Act, in construing enactments, words in the singular include the plural and words in the plural include the singular. See COKER v. ADETAYO (1996) 6 NWLR (PT 454) 258 at 266, UDEH v. THE STATE...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EXPRESSIO UNIUS EST EXCLUSION ALTERIUS

Reach more audience. Place advert here.

Was this dictum helpful?

STATUTE SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED THAT IT DEFEATS ITS PURPOSE

Membership Required

STATUTES ARE TO BE GIVEN THE ORDINARY MEANING

Membership Required

COURT SHOULD AVOID INTERPRETATION THAT WOULD REDUCE THE LEGISLATURE TO FUTILITY

Membership Required

INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 82 CFRN 1999

Membership Required

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS NEEDED ORIGINATING SUMMONS IS APPROPRIATE

Was this dictum helpful?

BY INTERPRETATION ACT, SINGULAR MEANS PLURAL IN ANY LEGISLATION

Membership Required