STOP SEEING INTRUSIVE ADS, & HAVE PREMIUM FEATURES? Stop seeing intrusive ads and have a smoother reading experience, once you sign up on Judicial Poetry. Sign up now!

HAPPENINGS IN PROCEEDINGS SHOULD BE RECORDED

Reach more audience. Place advert here.

Otapo v. Sunmonu (1987) 2 N.W.L.R. (Part 58) 587, per Belgore, J.S.C., at p.624, has stressed the importance of proper recording of proceedings: “It is in the interest of justice that all that is said or raised in court during hearing be taken down in writing that is, be properly recorded. When this is not done and it is through the affidavit of parties that the true records could be known, questions will usually be asked why the court adopted such a procedure.”

– Achike JCA. Adeyemi v. Edigin (1990)

Was this dictum helpful?

SHARE ON

record

APPELLATE COURT MUST NOT READ INTO RECORD WHAT IS NOT THERE

This Court had held that an Appellate Court has no jurisdiction to read into the record what is not there and it equally has no jurisdiction to read out of the record what is contained therein. Both are forbidden areas for an Appellate Court. An Appellate Court must read the record in its exact content and interpret it.

– H.M. Ogunwumiju, JSC. State v. Ibrahim (2021) – SC.200/2016

Was this dictum helpful?

COURTS AND PARTIES ARE BOUND BY THE RECORDS

It is trite, that the Courts and the parties are bound by the record. An appellate Court is not vested with the vires to factor into a record what is not there nor read out of it what is in it. In other words, it must construe the record in its exact content devoid of interpolation or subtraction.

— O.F. Ogbuinya, JCA. Impact Solutions v. International Breweries (2018) – CA/AK/122/2016