Judiciary-Poetry-Logo
JPoetry

MAIN APPEAL MAY RENDER USELESS A CROSS-APPEAL

Reach more audience. Place advert here.

Dictum

I also agree that the decision in the main appeal, has, effectively and for all practical purposes, overtaken and rendered the cross appeal of no useful utilitarian value or worth to the cross Appellants to warrant a consideration on the merit by the Court. – Garba JSC. APC v. Obaseki (2021)

Was this dictum helpful?

SHARE ON

RESPONDENT WITHOUT CROSS-APPEAL SHOULD ADOPT APPELLANT’S GROUNDS OF APPEAL

A respondent, without a cross-appeal or Respondent’s Notice, may adopt the issues formulated by the Appellant or formulate his own issues provided the issues so formulated are derivable from the grounds of appeal.

— N.S. Ngwuta, JSC. Odogwu v State (2013) – SC.122/2009

Was this dictum helpful?

CROSS-APPEAL IS A DISTINCT APPEAL

It must be remembered that under the rules of the court, a cross- appeal must be treated as a distinct appeal having all the tapestry of an appeal. It is akin to a counter-claim before a trial court.

– Musdapher, JSC. Atta v. Ezeanah (2000)

Was this dictum helpful?

WITHOUT CROSS-APPEAL OR RESPONDENT NOTICE, RESPONDENT CANNOT CHALLENGE TRIAL COURT’S JUDGMENT

It appears then that what the Respondent is asking for is a variation of the judgment of the lower court with regard to damages and the award by this court of “appropriate and commensurate damages.” The law is that the Respondents cannot challenge the judgment of the lower court given in their favour without first filing a cross-appeal or a Respondents Notice. See Oguma v. I.B.W.A. (1988) NWLR (Pt. 73) 658.

– Iyizoba, JCA. Emirate v. Aforka (2014) – CA/L/285/2011

Was this dictum helpful?

WHERE A RESPONDENT DID NOT FILE A CROSS-APPEAL, CANNOT RAISE ISSUES NOT CONTAINED IN ORIGINAL GROUND OF APPEAL

It seems to me obvious that the respondents’ issue under consideration is not predicated on any of the appellant’s grounds of appeal. The respondent did not file a cross-appeal. The position of the law is that where a respondent has not filed a cross-appeal, the role of the appellate court is limited to seeing whether or not the decision of the court below is correct. Such a respondent does not have an unrestrained or unbridled freedom of raising issues for determination which have no relevance to the grounds of appeal filed: See the case of Dr. J.M. Udom v. Micheletti and Sons (1982) 7 SCNJ 448 at 457; (1997) 8 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 516) 187.

— Edozie JSC. Cosm As Ezukwu v. Peter Ukachukwu Jude Ukachukwu (SC. 160/2000, 2 July 2004)

Was this dictum helpful?

A PARTY WHO HAS JUDGEMENT CANNOT COMPLAIN EXCEPT BY APPEAL OR CROSS-APPEAL

A party who has judgment in his favour and who has not cross-appealed or who has not taken out a respondent’s notice is not entitled to raise any adverse issue arising from the judgment. The only way to show grievance of a judgment is by way of appeal and in certain cases by way of a respondent’s notice. In view of the fact that the appellant had judgment in the High Court, all that she should have done, if not satisfied with the statement of the trial Judge on the issue of payment of the processing fee ofN300.00 by the respondent was to commence a cross-appeal. In the absence of that, the appellant has to accept the decision of the High Court with all its sweetness and bitterness cum onere. And what is more, the judgment before this court on appeal is the judgment of the Court of Appeal and not the judgment of the High Court. In the circumstances, I shall discountenance all the negative issues raised against the judgment of the learned trial Judge by counsel for the appellant.

— N. Tobi, JSC. Ezennah v Atta (2004) – SC.226/2000

Was this dictum helpful?

A RESPONDENT CANNOT ATTACK THE DECISION OF A LOWER COURT EXCEPT THROUGH CROSS APPEAL

When this Appeal was heard on 16 December, 2019, learned counsel for the 2nd and 3rd Respondents, D. Ameh informed the Court that his brief was irregular. He did not say how his brief was irregular. Rather than defend the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the 2nd and 3rd Respondents filed a joint brief attacking the judgment. In their conclusion they pray this Court to set aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal and in its place restore the judgment of the trial Court dismissing the claims of the 1st Respondent. Their role is fundamentally wrong. Their prayer ought to be for this Court to dismiss the Appeal. Since the 2nd and 3rd Respondents abandoned their role as Respondents’, their joint brief would not be considered. It is hereby struck out.

— O. Rhodes-Vivour, JSC. Bakari v. Ogundipe (2020) – SC.514/2015

Was this dictum helpful?

Load More
No more related dictum to show.

Click the icons to like, follow, and join JPoetry

Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Telegram

Humongouz Empire

© 2025

designed by Humongouz Ztudio. 

TO – 319 | UO – 0 | GO – 277 | BO – 42

External link(s)

BOOK: First 2-years as a Law Student: Experiences and Lessons.