CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER GIVES EFFECT TO THE JUDGEMENT AND NEED NOT BE ASKED FOR

WHAT IS A CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER

And I start by asking myself what a consequential order really means. It is, in my view, an order which flows necessarily, naturally, directly and consequentially from a decision or judgment delivered by a court in a cause or matter. It arises logically and inevitably by reason of the fact that the order in question is per force obviously and patently consequent upon the decision given by the court and did not need to be specifically claimed as a distinct or separate head or item of relief. The purpose of a consequential order is to give effect to the decision or judgment of the court but not by granting an entirely new, unclaimed and/or incongruous relief which was not contested by the parties at the trial and neither did it fall in alignment with the original reliefs claimed in the suit nor was it in the contemplation of the parties that such relief would be the subject matter of a formal executory judgment or order against either side to the dispute. A consequential order may also not be properly made to give to a party, an entitlement to a relief he has not established in his favour. – Iguh JSC. Awoniyi v. AMORC (2000)

WHAT IS A CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER

So what is a consequential order? A consequential order is one giving effect to a judgment or order to which it is consequential. It is directly traceable to or flowing from that judgment or order duly prayed for and made.

– Katsina-Alu, JSC. Dantsoho v. Mohammed (2003)

PARTY TO OBEY COURT RULING UNTIL REVERSED

It is true that the present Applicants appealed against the above Ruling of the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal has not yet been heard. It is only the Supreme Court that can validly pronounce on the correctness or otherwise of the Appeal Court’s Ruling and Order. The present Applicants are bound whether they like it or not, to abide by the ruling and comply with the order of the Court of Appeal until reversed.

– Oputa, JSC. Military Governor v. Ojukwu (1986) – SC.241/1985

IT IS A SERIOUS MATTER TO FLOUT A POSITIVE ORDER OF COURT

I think it is a very serious matter for anyone to flout a positive order of a court and proceed to taunt the Court further by seeking a remedy in a higher court while still in contempt of the lower court. It is more serious when the act of flouting the order of the court, the contempt of the court, is by the Executive.

– Eso, JSC. Military Governor v. Ojukwu (1986) – SC.241/1985