MATTER ALREADY ADJUDICATED UPON IS RES JUDICATA

Para. 19: “The doctrine of res judicata simply states that once a matter/cause has been finally determined, it is not open to either party to re-open or re-litigate that same matter. A matter is said to be res judicata if it has already been adjudicated upon by a competent Court. This prevents it from being pursued further by the same parties. Res judicata precludes the continued litigation of same issues between the same parties. The matter cannot be raised again either in the same Court or in a different Court. In other words, for a plea of res judicata to be sustained, both the subject matter and parties must be the same.”

— Osaghae v Nigeria (2017) – ECW/CCJ/JUD/03/17

Was this dictum helpful?

RES JUDICATA WILL SUCCEED WHEN IT IS SHOWN THAT THE MATTER BROUGHT IS SAME AS THAT ALREADY DECIDED

Para. 20: In Aliyu Tasheku V. FRN, ECW/CCJ/RUL/12/12, (unreported), The Court was of the view that the argument concerning res judicata can only succeed when it is established that the Application brought before it is essentially the same as another one already satisfactorily decided upon before a competent Domestic Court or an International Tribunal.

Was this dictum helpful?

RES JUDICATA OPERATES WHERE APPLICATION IS SAME AS ONE ALREADY DECIDED SATISFACTORILY

Para. 13: “The Court is of the view that the argument concerning res judicata can only succeed when it is established that the Application brought before it is essentially the same as another one already satisfactorily decided upon before a competent domestic court.”

— Tasheku v FRN (2012) – ECW/CCJ/RUL/12/12

Was this dictum helpful?

WHERE AN ISSUE OR FACT HAS BEEN DETERMINED IN A FINAL MANNER, IT CONSTITUTES ESTOPPEL PER JUDGEMENT

The law is settled that where an issue of fact affecting the status of a person or a thing has been determined in a final manner as a substantive part of a judgment of a court having jurisdiction to determine that status, such determination will constitute estoppel by judgment to any subsequent proceedings between any...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

CONDITIONS FOR PLEA OF RES JUDICATA

SALAMI AFOLABI V. GOVERNOR OF OSUN STATE (2003) 13 NWLR (Pt.386) 119 at 129 – 130 the Supreme Court emphasized thus: “It is settled law that to sustain in a plea of res judicata, the party pleading it must satisfy the following conditionalities, to wit – i. That parties (or their privies as they may...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NATURE OF RES JUDICATA

From the cumulative summary of the foregoing authorities, it is clear that the existence of the principle is entirely a question of fact for purpose of establishing whether the parties and their privies, the facts in issue and the subject matter of the claim are the same in both the previous and the present suits....

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

PRINCIPLE OF RES JUDICATA

Reach more audience. Place advert here.

Was this dictum helpful?

MATTER ALREADY ADJUDICATED UPON IS RES JUDICATA

Was this dictum helpful?

RES JUDICATA WILL SUCCEED WHEN IT IS SHOWN THAT THE MATTER BROUGHT IS SAME AS THAT ALREADY DECIDED

Was this dictum helpful?

RES JUDICATA OPERATES WHERE APPLICATION IS SAME AS ONE ALREADY DECIDED SATISFACTORILY

Was this dictum helpful?

WHERE AN ISSUE OR FACT HAS BEEN DETERMINED IN A FINAL MANNER, IT CONSTITUTES ESTOPPEL PER JUDGEMENT

Membership Required

CONDITIONS FOR PLEA OF RES JUDICATA

Membership Required

NATURE OF RES JUDICATA

Membership Required