OMNIBUS GROUND OF APPEAL IS NOT A GROUND OF LAW
Kenuj Inv. Ltd. v. D.H. & S.S. Ltd. (2026) 10 NWLR (Pt. 2049) 1 at 28, C—F: ‘It is trite that an omnibus ground of appeal alleging that the judgment of a trial court is against the weight of evidence is, by its very nature, not a ground of law. Failure to seek and obtain leave in respect thereof renders such a ground incompetent. In Mainasara v. F.B.N. (2021) LPELR – 56612 (SC), (2022) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1827) 465, this court held that: “It is trite that the omnibus ground of appeal which alleges that a decision of a trial court is against the weight of evidence is, by its inherent nature, not aground of law and failure to seek leave renders such ground incompetent. See Nwadike v. Ibekwe (1987) 4NWLR (Pt. 67) 718 at 743, para. H and 744, para. A; Teriba v. Adeyemo (2010) 11 NWLR (Pt. 1211) 243 at267, para. H.” In the circumstance, only ground 13 of the notice of appeal filed on the 8th day of August, 2018 is incompetent and liable to be struck out. All the other grounds, being grounds of law, are competent and sufficient to sustain the appeal. The said grounds therefore constitute a valid foundation upon which the amended notice of appeal filed on the 28th day of February, 2020 and deemed on the 6th day of July, 2021 rests.’