WHERE WORDS ARE CLEAR NO INTERPRETATION IS NEEDED

It is settled law that where the words of a statute or Constitution are clear and unambiguous, they call for no interpretation, the duty of the court in such a circumstance being to apply the words as used by the legislature. – WS Onnoghen, JSC. Calabar CC v. Ekpo (2008) Was this dictum helpful? Yes...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

THE PHRASE “IN LIEU OF NOTICE”

I consider it necessary to say something about the phrase “in lieu of notice” which is liable to be misunderstood, in this connection. The phrase has been defined in the Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Language 4th Ed. page 687 as “in the place, instead of “. Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed. P.787, also defines...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

LEGISLATION WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT

Thus, the effect of making Exhibit 7, a subsidiary legislation with retrospective effect, to take care of the appointment process of the Emirship of Suleja, which as I earlier pointed out, has the force of law and now over-rides customary law. This is the moreso, in the instant case where confusion characterising the kingmaker’s body...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS NEEDED ORIGINATING SUMMONS IS APPROPRIATE

KEYAMO VS. HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, LAGOS STATE (2000) 11 W.R.N. 29 at 40, (2000) 12 NWLR (Pt. 680) 796 at 213 stated as follows: “I must state that the correct position of the law is that originating summons is used to commence an action where the issue involved is one of the construction of a written law or of any instrument made under a written law, or of any deed, contract or other document or some other question of law or where there is unlikely to be any substantial dispute of fact. This is the provision of Order 3 Rule 2 (2) of the Lagos State Civil Procedure (supra)”

Was this dictum helpful?

COURT SHOULD AVOID CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL CAUSE CHAOS

In Okotie Eboh v. Manager (supra) Pats-Acholonu, JSC (of blessed memory) pronounced as follows: ‘An interpretation that seeks to emasculate should be avoided as it would do disservice to the citizenry and confine everyone into a legal container or labyrinth from which this court may not easily extricate itself ——– I believe that though justice...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENTS & STATUTES ARE TO BE GIVEN THEIR ORDINARY MEANING

I think it is trite that in construing a constitutional document there is the need to look at its provisions as a whole and where possible, give such provisions their ordinary and natural meaning. See BANK OF ENGLAND v. VAGLIANO BROS. (1891) AC. 107 at 144 where Lord Herschell put the position thus:- “I think...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

COMMON SENSE SHOULD BE APPLIED IN CONSTRUING STATUTES

Reach more audience. Place advert here.

Was this dictum helpful?

WHERE WORDS ARE CLEAR NO INTERPRETATION IS NEEDED

Membership Required

THE PHRASE “IN LIEU OF NOTICE”

Membership Required

LEGISLATION WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT

Membership Required

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS NEEDED ORIGINATING SUMMONS IS APPROPRIATE

Was this dictum helpful?

COURT SHOULD AVOID CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL CAUSE CHAOS

Membership Required

CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENTS & STATUTES ARE TO BE GIVEN THEIR ORDINARY MEANING

Membership Required