WHERE ACCUSED PLEADS GUILTY PROSECUTION BURDEN BECOMES LIGHT

OMOJU v. FRN (2008) LPELR – 2647 (SC), Tobi JSC (of blessed memory), considered the effect of an accused person’s plea of guilt on the burden placed on the prosecution where my noble Lord held thus: “The law is elementary that if an accused person pleads guilty, the burden of proof placed on the prosecution...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

FOR DECLARATION TO LAND, PARTY CANNOT RELY ON WEAKNESS OF DEFENDANT’S CASE

A plethora of authorities abound that a party in a suit for declaration of title to land cannot depend on the weakness of an opponent’s case to succeed. See Kodilinye v. Odu 1935 2 WACA 336, Akinola v. Olowu 1962 1 SCNLR 352, and Ibeziako v. Nwegbogu 1970 1 NMLR 113. — A.M. Mukhtar JSC....

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

PLAINTIFF MUST RELY ON THE STRENGTH OF HIS CASE AND NOT WEAKNESS OF DEFENDANT’S CASE

The onus in such cases lies on the plaintiff to satisfy the court that he is entitled on the evidence brought by him to the declaration of title claimed. In this regard, the plaintiff must rely on the strength of his own case and not on the weakness of the defendant’s case. If this onus...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

CIVIL SUIT IS DECIDED ON THE BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES

Now, civil suits are decided on the balance of probabilities, on the preponderance of evidence. The burden of proof is not static but shifts and the onus of adducing further evidence is on the person who will fail if such evidence is not adduced. See Osuji v Eke [2009] 16 NWLR (Pt 1166) 81.

— O.A. Obaseki-Osaghea, J. Akinsete v Westerngeco (2014) – NICN/LA/516/2012

Was this dictum helpful?

FACTS ADMITTED NEEDS NO FURTHER PROOF

U.D.F.U. v. Kraus (2001) 24 WRN 78 @ p. 91, where it was held firmly inter alia thus: “The law is unequivocal that a fact admitted by the Defendant in his pleading must be taken by a Court of law as established and should therefore be treated as one of the agreed facts between the parties to the suit. Indeed, these facts are directly admitted as in the instant case or deemed admitted as provided for in the Rules of Court dealing with pleadings, such averments do not need to be processed in Court … The judgement of the Court delivered on 17|2|97 based on the admission cannot be faulted.”

Was this dictum helpful?

HE WHO ASSERTS A FACT HAS THE BURDEN TO PROVE THOSE FACTS

The appellants in their petition desired the Tribunal to give judgment to them granting them the reliefs they claimed on the basis that the facts they assert in their petition exist. Therefore, they had the primary legal burden to prove the existence of those facts by virtue of S.131(1) of the Evidence Act 2011 which...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

BURDEN TO PROVIDE DOCUMENT IS IN THE PARTY WHO IS IN POSSESSION OF THE DOCUMENT

Reach more audience. Place advert here.

Was this dictum helpful?

WHERE ACCUSED PLEADS GUILTY PROSECUTION BURDEN BECOMES LIGHT

Membership Required

FOR DECLARATION TO LAND, PARTY CANNOT RELY ON WEAKNESS OF DEFENDANT’S CASE

Membership Required

PLAINTIFF MUST RELY ON THE STRENGTH OF HIS CASE AND NOT WEAKNESS OF DEFENDANT’S CASE

Membership Required

CIVIL SUIT IS DECIDED ON THE BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES

Was this dictum helpful?

FACTS ADMITTED NEEDS NO FURTHER PROOF

Was this dictum helpful?

HE WHO ASSERTS A FACT HAS THE BURDEN TO PROVE THOSE FACTS

Membership Required