Judiciary-Poetry-Logo
JPoetry

INGREDIENTS TO PROVE LIBELOUS PUBLICATION

Dictum

In proof of a libelous publication or to sustain an action for libel, the plaintiff must prove that: (a) There was a publication. (b) The publication was false. (c) The publication was in writing. (d) The publication was made to a person apart from the plaintiff and the defendant. (e) The publication referred to the said plaintiff. (f) The publication was made by the defendant. See Iloabachie v. Iloabachie (2005) 4 FWLR (Pt.281) 469 SC at 511, Paras. E-F; Guardian Newspaper and Anor v. Ajeh (2011) 1 LPELR-SC. 234.

— S.D. West, JCA. Fayose v ICN (2012) – CA/AE/58/2010

Was this dictum helpful?

SHARE ON

HOW THE TORT OF LIBEL IS COMMITTED

The tort of libel is committed through the publication of defamatory words in writing. It is a tort in which the writer or publisher attacks the reputation, integrity, standing and or fidelity of the victim of the publication. However, published words which are considered to be vulgar abuses, will not normally ground an action for libel or slander. What could be regarded as vulgar abuse would however depend on the exact words published, the status of the parties and the circumstances when the publication is made. For instance, abusive words uttered by low class people or motor park drivers and workers which are usually uttered as prelude to a fight, are usually regarded as vulgar abuses as they are normally never taken very seriously and could therefore not ground an action for either slander or libel. See Sketch Publishing Company Ltd. v. Ajagbemokeferi (1989) 1 NWLR (Pt. 100) 678; Nwachukwu v. Nnoremeke (1957) 2 E.R.L.R. 50; and Union Bank of Nigeria Ltd. v. Oredein (1992) 6 NWLR (Pt. 247) 355.

— Akintan, JSC. Iloabachie v Iloabachie (2005) – SC.137/2000

Was this dictum helpful?