Judiciary-Poetry-Logo
JPoetry

CRITERIA TO HAVE PERSONAL INFORMATION OF A PUBLIC OFFICIAL – FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

Dictum

It is clear from the provisions of Section 14(1) of FIA that the right of access to information in custody of a public official, agency or institution is not an unbridled, uncontrolled and absolute right. It is curtailed by Section 14(1) of the Act by denying access to private or personal information of a citizen in custody of a public official. For any citizen to have access to personal information in custody of a public official or institution, he must show that: (1) The individual to whom the information relates has given his consent to the disclosure or (2) That the information is publicly available anyway or (3) That the disclosure is in the public interest and the public interest outweighs the protection of the privacy of the individual to whom the information relates.

— M.O. Bolaji-Yusuff, JCA. CCB v Nwankwo (2018) – CA/E/141/2017

Was this dictum helpful?

SHARE ON

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT IS TO MAKE PUBLIC INFORMATION AVAILABLE

It is clear from the explanatory note to FIA that the purpose of the Act is to make public records and information more freely available and provide access to all citizens to all public records and information. The Act however provides for the protection of personal information of a public officer in the custody of a public institution. This is made clear by Section 14(1) of the Act which excludes personal information in the custody of any public official, agency or institution from the information to which any citizen of Nigeria is entitled to have access.

— M.O. Bolaji-Yusuff, JCA. CCB v Nwankwo (2018) – CA/E/141/2017

Was this dictum helpful?